How do littles feel about being called "daughter"?

[San Diego Daddy]

My Little, like others, was abandoned by her biological Father and needs a lot of reassurance that I won't leave her. She's asked me if it's OK for her to pretend I'm the only Daddy she's known and be her "real" Daddy. The obvious implication is that she wants to see herself as my real daughter. I allow it because it helps her cope with depression and anxiety and in our dynamic under my protection I can guarantee it's safe and controlled. I have a biological daughter and it greatly reassures my little knowing I'm including her when I say, "my daughters." I usually add context for specifically (not always), such as "Princess Daughter."

 

Every Little has unique needs and what may be traumatizing for someone (victim of abuse) may be comforting for someone else (abandoned by biological father for a new marriage's children).

 

The CG should meet the needs of their littles, middles, submissives, et al in a way that does no harm. The vulnerabilty and trust required for a little to voice their needs like mine did, should not be dismissed from a position of fear.

 

Fear of perception from anyone outside a (private) dynamic is the ultimate insecurity. While those being cared for may struggle with this, it is the responsibility of the CG to confidently choose what is in their Little's best interest - not any third party.

 

Having said that, I don't want to sound dismissive of the 100% valid concerns voiced here. In general, I'm in complete agreement with those concerns; however, concerns are concerns only, they don't imply right or wrong.

 

Touchy subject for my first post, please don't throw tomatoes!

[Mouse-]

personally no.

 

But I’m about to say some controversial stuff, please no one hate me.

 

But kink is a giant multiple overlapping map of some sort.

 

What a lot of “vanilla” people (even some non vanilla people) forget is that for the most part safe, sane, consensual is the foundation for kink.

 

Whilst that doesn’t make every kink morally okay, that doesn’t mean that if it’s not your flavor that it’s bad.

 

There are I’m sure plenty of people into inc*st role play that are not at all interested in actual inc*st. I mean the hub is clear proof of that. To the point where we all know the “what are you doing step bro” joke.

 

There are people that are into cnc but do not condone the very illegal and terrible thing that is the nc portion of that. (Also known as the R word)

 

There are a lot of kinks that I personally am really not at all okay with PERSONALLY that are lumped in with CG/L / DDLG (whichever acronym suits you), but I understand why it is that they are.

 

I think that to the wrong people who don’t understand and are too close minded to even try to understand, no matter how much we explain that cg/l or ddlg (again choose your acronym), they will not be changing their mind or views on the matter.

 

Also what other people do in the bedroom (again so long as it’s legal, and consensual) is not my business, nor do I intend to make it my business as I’m not going to be joining them in the bedroom.

 

TLDR:

If you’re practicing legal and safe kink, let your freak flag fly, I don’t give a frick. But also it’s a no for me dawg.