More than one Daddy?

[LittleLuna13]

I'm little and poly. I could be very wrong, but in my (admittedly limited) experience most poly littles or Daddys tend to only have one partner that they do the DDlg dynamic with and other partners are different dynamics.

 

However, I genuninley believe that I am unable to be in a relationship that doesn't have that sort of dynamic. It may not be the main focus, but because of how I am as a person I automatically end up submissive and little/petlike with a partner. It isn't even a concious thing, it just happens.

 

So I was wondering if there are Daddys out there that would be okay with their little having more than one caregiver?

Sorry for the rambling I wasn't really sure how to word it.

 

Edit: I just wanted to clarify that for me personally, I'd want a 'main' Daddy then other relationships as something similar to 'big brother' or 'uncle'. I can't think of any other terms off the top of my head.

Edited January 7, 2017 by littlemisjiff

[Daddy's_Babygirl]

I am not poly, however I encourage you to contact MissJellybean on here. She is and could probably offer some insight

[Guest]

I have wondered the same thing but after looking into the subject, yeah there are littles with multiple caregivers and also caregivers that have multiple littles.

 

As said above MissJellybean would be a good person to contact

[LittleLuna13]

Thank you very much for the replies! I'll have to contact her and see if she wouldn't mind talking to me about it

[Selective]

 

Monogamy makes sense, polygyny makes sense sort of. Polyandry is ridiculous.

 

One person deciding how other people have a relationship is the only thing that is "ridiculous."

 

I appreciate you trying to make sense of this through biology, but like many psudo-scientists you have simply omitted data that doesn't fit into your personal beliefs. Please look into Bonobos and how they form matriarchies. Here is a link for matriarchies. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matriarchy

 

Matriarchy societies have EVOLVED in NATURE in species such as Bonobos, which you should know, are just as closely related to our ancestors as chimps.

 

The are many advantages to polyandry not only in nature, but for humans as well. I personally practice monogamy because that is what works for me. But I would never look down on or call another person's beliefs about love and relationships ridiculous.  Because they are just that. Beliefs. Unique to each individual.

 

Polyandry has also been found throughout history in Africa, Asia, Europe, AND the Americas. So just because the vikings were polygamous, does not make having multiple wives the default. Nor does the number of women you own, determine your power. Power does not come from owning women. In our community, littles have all the power. Male, female, and other. They choose who they wish to submit to. I urge you not to confuse dominant and power. They are not synonyms, especially here. 

Edited January 7, 2017 by Selective

[Guest]

Chewbacca, you REALLY need to educate yourself before spouting off such foolish opinion.

Your own personal beliefs are not fact, even if you try to grab at straws with bits of history. 

The modern relationships people choice to be in are not " ridiculous" , your options truly are though..

https://www.ddlgforum.com/topic/12926-polyamory-basics-by-belle/

[Selective]

Immature retorts aside, may I read your published scientific report? I'm genuinely interested.

[Guest QueenJellybean]

@OP:

 

Hi! I am the mentioned MissJellybean! I'd love to chat with you about this sometime, and I'm happy to see that not only was I mentioned here, but so was my resource writing! Thank you so much! Shoot me a message sometime! 

[Daddy's_Babygirl]

Yay! Glad you found this post MissJellybean!

[Guest LicklePrincess]

Clearly multiple people within this post need a reminder of the rules, which can be found here. 

 

Please pay particular attention to 

• Whilst we respect healthy debate, we do ask that you do so with respect and do not personally attack the other people you're debating with.

This thread is being now being locked since it's clear it has been derailed by disrectful rants.